Emphasising Employer-Employee Relationship and Genuine Role Requirements; Tech and Healthcare Petitions Face Closer Scrutiny; H-1B Aspirants Should Align Job Descriptions with SOC Codes

In an increasingly rigorous immigration landscape, employers and H-1B aspirants alike are discovering that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is placing an unprecedented emphasis on the authenticity of the employer-employee relationship and the genuine nature of stated job requirements. This heightened scrutiny, particularly noticeable in the tech and healthcare sectors, isn't just about dotting i's and crossing t's; it's a fundamental re-evaluation of how companies define roles and engage foreign talent.

Indeed, recent quarters have seen a significant uptick in Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and even outright denials for H-1B petitions that fail to clearly demonstrate a direct, supervisory employer-employee relationship or where job descriptions appear to be boilerplate or misaligned with industry standards. This isn't merely an administrative hurdle; it's a strategic shift by USCIS to ensure the program serves its intended purpose: bringing highly skilled foreign workers to fill genuine, specialized needs within U.S. companies, not merely facilitating staffing arrangements or vague consulting roles.

---

Tech Sector: Navigating the Nuances of Modern Work

The technology industry, with its dynamic project-based work, third-party client sites, and rapidly evolving job functions, finds itself particularly under the microscope. Historically, many tech companies, especially consultancies, have sponsored H-1B visas for employees who would then be placed at client sites for extended periods. While this model isn't inherently problematic, USCIS is now demanding robust evidence that the petitioning employer – not the client – retains ultimate control over the H-1B worker's employment, including hiring and firing, supervision, and performance reviews.

"It's no longer enough to just state that you're the employer," explains a seasoned immigration attorney specializing in tech visas. "USCIS wants to see detailed work statements, organizational charts, proof of proprietary tools or methodologies, and clear evidence of direct supervision by the petitioning company. They're looking for substance over form, especially in cases involving multiple layers of contractors or fluid project assignments." Companies like Infosys or TCS, which often operate on a client-site model, have had to significantly bolster their documentation processes to meet these evolving standards. The onus is on the employer to prove they aren't just a pass-through entity.

---

Healthcare: Addressing Direct Patient Care and Staffing Models

Similarly, the healthcare sector faces its own unique challenges. While there's an undeniable demand for healthcare professionals across the U.S., petitions for roles like nurses, physical therapists, and medical technologists are also undergoing closer examination. The primary concern here often revolves around the directness of the employer-employee relationship, especially when staffing agencies are involved, and the specific licensing and educational requirements for roles that involve direct patient care.

USCIS wants clear assurances that the H-1B beneficiary will be performing specialized duties directly for the petitioning hospital, clinic, or healthcare provider. Any intermediary staffing arrangements must be meticulously documented to show the petitioning entity maintains control and responsibility. Furthermore, the agency is scrutinizing whether the proffered position genuinely requires a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific specialty, aligning with the H-1B's specialized occupation criteria, and whether the beneficiary holds the necessary state licenses by the time the petition is filed or approved.

---

The Critical Alignment with SOC Codes

Crucially, for both employers and H-1B aspirants, success hinges on a meticulous alignment of the job description with the appropriate Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code. The Department of Labor (DOL) uses SOC codes to classify occupations, and USCIS relies heavily on this framework to determine if a position qualifies as a "specialty occupation" – the bedrock of H-1B eligibility.

Many RFEs stem from a perceived mismatch between the stated job duties and the educational requirements generally associated with the chosen SOC code. For instance, a "Software Developer" (SOC code 15-1132) typically requires a bachelor's degree in computer science or a related field. If a petition lists duties that seem more administrative or generalist, or if the educational background of the applicant doesn't align, it raises red flags.

H-1B aspirants, in particular, should proactively engage with their prospective employers to ensure their resume and the proposed job description are not only accurate but also strategically aligned with a suitable SOC code. This involves:

1. Detailed Job Duties: Avoid generic bullet points. Describe specific tasks, technologies used, project responsibilities, and the level of expertise required.
2. Educational Requirements: Clearly link the job's complexity and specialized nature to the need for a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific field.
3. Industry Context: Explain how the role fits within the company's operations and industry standards.
4. Wage Level: The proposed wage must also align with the selected SOC code and geographic location, further reinforcing the specialized nature of the role.

---

Best Practices for Navigating Heightened Scrutiny

For employers, this means a more proactive and evidence-driven approach to H-1B petitions. It's about building an airtight case from the outset, anticipating potential USCIS questions. This includes:

• Robust Documentation: Providing detailed client letters, project plans, organizational charts, and comprehensive statements of work.
• Clear Supervisory Control: Demonstrating how the petitioning employer exercises direct control over the H-1B worker, even at client sites.
• Legal Counsel: Engaging experienced immigration attorneys who can help craft compelling arguments and prepare for potential RFEs.
• Internal Vetting: Thoroughly reviewing job descriptions and candidate qualifications before filing to ensure alignment with H-1B requirements and SOC codes.

For H-1B aspirants, the message is equally clear: understand your role, its requirements, and how it aligns with the U.S. immigration framework. Don't just rely on your employer to handle everything. Ask questions, ensure your resume accurately reflects the specialized skills required for the role, and be prepared to articulate how your background directly qualifies you for a specialty occupation.

In this evolving landscape, the emphasis is firmly on transparency, specificity, and genuine intent. Those who embrace these principles will be far better positioned to navigate the complexities of H-1B petitions successfully.