Back to BlogAny Query?
Navigating the Maze: CRICOS Compliance and Agent Conduct — A Shared Responsibility to Curb Fraud
October 18, 2025
5 min read
Harleen Kaur Bawa

Navigating the Maze: CRICOS Compliance and Agent Conduct — A Shared Responsibility to Curb Fraud

Share:TwitterLinkedIn

Australia's international education sector, a multi-billion dollar industry and a cornerstone of its soft power, is currently under intense scrutiny. With the post-pandemic resurgence in student visa applications, concerns around fraudulent activities have prompted a significant tightening of regulations and a renewed focus on the integrity of the system. At the heart of this effort lies robust CRICOS compliance and the ethical conduct of education agents, with a critical, often overlooked, responsibility falling squarely on the shoulders of the applicants themselves: to verify provider registration.

The stakes couldn't be higher. Fraudulent applications not only undermine the integrity of Australia's visa system but also jeopardise the reputation of legitimate education providers and exploit vulnerable prospective students. The Department of Home Affairs and the Department of Education have been actively recalibrating their approach, recognising that a multi-pronged strategy is essential to safeguard this vital sector.


The Bedrock of Integrity: Understanding CRICOS Compliance

Central to Australia's framework for international education is the Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students, or CRICOS. Every education provider wishing to enrol international students on a student visa must be registered on CRICOS, and every course offered to these students must also be listed. This isn't just a bureaucratic hurdle; it's a fundamental consumer protection mechanism.

"CRICOS registration signifies that a provider meets the stringent quality and consumer protection standards set out in the Education Services for Overseas Students (ESOS) Act 2000 and the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018," explains Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading expert in international education policy. "It covers everything from course quality and facilities to student support services and financial viability. Without it, a provider cannot legally enrol international students on a student visa."

Recent reports have highlighted instances where unregistered entities have attempted to operate or where registered providers have failed to uphold their obligations, leading to swift regulatory action. These breaches can range from offering courses not listed on CRICOS to failing to report changes in student enrolment or providing inadequate welfare support. Penalties for non-compliance are severe, including financial sanctions, suspension, or even cancellation of CRICOS registration, effectively shutting down their ability to teach international students.


The Agent Conundrum: Balancing Facilitation with Ethical Conduct

Education agents play an indispensable role in connecting international students with Australian institutions. They often provide invaluable advice on course selection, application processes, and visa requirements, particularly for students navigating complex systems from afar. However, this influential position also makes them a potential weak link in the fight against fraud.

The issue isn't with agents per se, but with a minority who engage in unethical or fraudulent practices. This might involve:

  • Misleading information: Providing inaccurate details about course outcomes, fees, or visa requirements.
  • Fabricating documents: Assisting applicants in submitting false academic transcripts, financial statements, or English language test results.
  • Unauthorised visa advice: Offering immigration advice without being a registered migration agent, which is illegal and often leads to incorrect or harmful guidance.
  • Exploiting vulnerabilities: Targeting students desperate to migrate, rather than genuinely pursue education, and facilitating non-genuine applications.

"The vast majority of education agents operate with integrity, acting as trusted bridges between students and providers," notes Mr. David Chen, CEO of GlobalPath Education, a major agency network. "But the actions of a few bad actors cast a shadow over all of us. Providers must implement rigorous due diligence when partnering with agents, including regular training, performance monitoring, and clear codes of conduct. We need to actively share intelligence on fraudulent behaviour."

The government, in response, has increased scrutiny on agent conduct, with providers now facing greater responsibility for the actions of their agents. Some universities have even reduced their reliance on agents or implemented stricter vetting processes, demanding transparency in commissions and clearer communication protocols.


The Applicant's Crucial Role: Verify, Verify, Verify

While government bodies and education providers bear significant responsibility for maintaining system integrity, prospective international students are the final, critical line of defence against fraud. Empowering applicants with the knowledge and tools to verify information is paramount.

"The most fundamental step an applicant can take is to check if their chosen provider and course are genuinely registered on CRICOS," advises Dr. Sharma. "It's a simple process, takes minutes, and can save them years of heartbreak and financial loss."

Applicants must visit the official CRICOS website and search for their prospective institution and specific course. Key details to look for include:

  • The provider's legal name and trading name.
  • Their CRICOS provider code.
  • The specific course name, CRICOS course code, duration, and campus locations.

If the details don't match, or if the provider isn't listed, it's a massive red flag.

Furthermore, applicants should:

  • Question unrealistic promises: Be wary of agents guaranteeing visas or promising exorbitant post-study work opportunities that seem too good to be true.
  • Never provide false information: Submitting fraudulent documents or misleading statements for a visa application can lead to visa refusal, ban from Australia, and severe legal consequences.
  • Understand their Genuine Temporary Entrant (GTE) requirements: Applicants must genuinely intend to come to Australia temporarily to study and comply with their visa conditions.
  • Seek independent advice: If unsure about visa matters, consult a Registered Migration Agent (RMA) listed on the Office of the Migration Agents Registration Authority (OMARA) website.

The integrity of Australia's international education sector is a shared responsibility. Through vigilant CRICOS compliance by providers, ethical conduct by education agents, and proactive verification by applicants, the industry can continue to thrive, attracting genuine students and contributing positively to Australia's economy and global standing, while effectively curbing the threat of fraud. The message is clear: due diligence is not optional; it's essential.

Harleen Kaur Bawa

About Harleen Kaur Bawa

Harleen Kaur Bawa is a licensed immigration attorney specializing in Canadian immigration and Indian services. With extensive experience in family sponsorship, Express Entry, refugee claims, and OCI services, she has successfully helped hundreds of clients navigate complex immigration processes.

Harleen holds degrees from York University - Osgoode Hall Law School and the University of Toronto, and is certified by the Law Society of Ontario and the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council. She is committed to providing personalized, professional legal services to help clients achieve their immigration goals.

Related Articles